Balancer, Beets, Stream, Morphos… stay safe out there.
The unfortunate truth is that there's an inverse relationship between privacy and public safety when it comes to crypto hack/exploits.
Let’s be clear — no number of audits can make any technology 100% secure. Fortune 500 companies spend millions each year on cybersecurity and audits, yet hackers still breach their systems. It’s not because those companies or service providers are incompetent. CT shouldn't be so quick to point fingers and blame the project team, auditors, etc.
Even with massive budgets, large organizations operate highly complex environments where human and process risks persist. Attackers only need to exploit ONE flaw, while defenders must protect EVERYTHING, all the time — and the threat landscape evolves faster than ever.
To put it simply: Attackers only need to succeed once; defenders must succeed always.
That’s the unfair advantage hackers have. A single misconfiguration, unpatched system, malicious vendor, or zero-day exploit can undo even the most robust defenses.
373
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。